Why VCs Exist: The Growth Math
The whole startup funding world falls out of the growth math. Why do investors fund unprofitable startups instead of steady profitable businesses? Because growth aligns incentives: in a fast-growing company, founders can't get rich without investors getting rich too, while a private business owner can quietly pay themselves and starve minority investors.
Growth also creates what investors actually need: exits. VCs return capital through IPOs and acquisitions, not dividends. Only fast-growing companies produce those outcomes, so only fast-growing companies fit the VC machine.
And the expected-value math works despite the failure rate: startups mostly die, but the rare 142x-a-year style winners are so valuable that funding a portfolio of attempts is rational. Nobody designed this system. It emerges from compounding.
Key idea
VC funding isn't culture, it's arithmetic. Growth aligns founder and investor payoffs and produces the exits VCs need, and rare huge winners justify the failure rate.